A strategy can state an intended outcome without explaining how responsibility will move between the institutions delivering it.
The structural questions are practical: who owns the next decision, what evidence is required, which dependencies remain and who resolves a conflict between responsibilities?
Inspect the connection, not only the document
Trace one material activity from its mandate to its evidence, review and decision. A gap in that chain is a concrete issue to resolve, not a reason to assume the entire strategy has failed.
Clearer structure does not substitute for a sound strategy or adequate resources. It helps people see whether the work is proceeding on an authorised, reviewable basis.
About this version
This archive article has been revised for clarity and scope. Its original publication date is not recorded; the date shown identifies this revision, not an inferred first publication.
Fracture → Signal → Spine → Assurance