Public reference

Fracture: identify the gap

A public reference for examining where evidence, responsibility and action may have separated.

01
Evidence
Can the material claim be traced to its source, method and relevant context?
Record missing or inconsistent information without silently filling the gap.
02
Responsibility
Is the responsible party named, and has that role been agreed?
Distinguish a proposed role from an established obligation.
03
Decision authority
Who may authorise the next action, and within which scope?
Keep participation, review and approval distinct.
04
Visibility
Can the relevant reviewer see the concern and its uncertainty?
A summary status should not conceal an unresolved material condition.
05
Escalation and correction
Who assesses the concern, and what happens after review?
Preserve the response and revisit conclusions affected by new information.

Fracture → Signal → Spine → Assurance

Evidence